Some high strength bolts can be galvanized while others cannot. In the construction fastener industry, typically the phrase “high strength” refers to bolts that have been quenched and tempered (heat treated) to develop the proper strength requirements of a given specification. In many cases, low alloy steels like ASTM A572g50 or F1554g55 are called “high strength”. There are no issues galvanizing those low alloy grades. However, for the purposes of this FAQ, we are only discussing quench and tempered fasteners. Two separate issues are involved in determining whether or not a high strength bolt can be galvanized.
Hydrogen Embrittlement Concerns
The first issue involves a phenomenon called hydrogen embrittlement which may occur when atomic hydrogen is absorbed by the steel during the acid pickling process that takes place prior to galvanizing. This embrittlement can potentially lead to the loss or partial loss of ductility in the steel and consequently result in the premature failure of the fastener in the field.
According to specification ASTM A143 – Safeguarding Against Embrittlement of Hot-Dip Galvanized Structural Steel Products and Procedure for Detecting Embrittlement:
“In practice hydrogen embrittlement of galvanized steel is usually of concern only if the steel exceeds approximately 150 ksi (1100 MPa) in ultimate tensile strength.”
Additionally, section 7.2.2 of specification ASTM F2329 – Zinc Coating, Hot-Dip, Requirements for Application to Carbon and Alloy Steel Bolts, Screws, Washers, Nuts, and Special Threaded Fasteners reads as follows:
“For high strength fasteners (having a specified minimum product hardness of 33 HRC), there is a risk of internal hydrogen embrittlement.”
By reviewing Table 1 below, it is clear that specifications ASTM A490, ASTM A354 grade BD, and SAE J429 grade 8 are all potentially susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement and should therefore not be hot-dip galvanized. This is further reinforced by specific references found in both the ASTM F3125/A490 specification and the ASTM A354 specification.
According to F3125 Annex A1 and Table A1.1 – Permitted Coatings, for grade A490 bolts both mechanical galvanizing per B695 and hot dip galvanizing per F2329 are “Not Qualified” meaning that those two coatings are currently prohibited on A490 grade fasteners.
Additionally, A354 in Section 4.3.5, Note 4 references ISO TR 20491, “Fundamentals of Hydrogen Embrittlement in Steel Fasteners”. Although this is well short of a specific prohibition, it is clear that the authors of A354 want to make sure that the user fully understands the potential pitfalls of hot dip galvanizing bolts of this grade.
This information taken directly from the ASTM specifications supports our belief that hot-dip galvanizing of ASTM A354 grade BD and SAE J429 grade 8, whereas not specifically prohibited, should be avoided due to the risk of hydrogen embrittlement. Additionally, F3125/A490 bolts are specifically prohibited from being coated with any non approved metallic coating.
Grade | Can I Galvanize? | Raw material | Nominal Size | Minimum Yield Strength | Minimum Tensile Strength | Minimum Hardness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTM F1554 Grade 55 | Yes | Low Alloy Steel | 1⁄2" - 4" | 55 | 75 | - |
ASTM F3125/A325 | Yes | Medium Carbon Steel, Quenched and Tempered |
1⁄2" - 11⁄2" | 92 | 120 | C25 |
ASTM A449 | Yes | 1⁄4" - 1" 11⁄8" - 11⁄2" 15⁄8" - 3" |
92 81 58 |
120 105 90 |
C25 C19 B91 |
|
SAE J429 Grade 5 | Yes | 1⁄4" - 1" 11⁄8" - 11⁄2" |
92 81 |
120 105 |
C25 C19 |
|
ASTM A193 Grade B7 | Yes | Medium Carbon Alloy Steel, Quenched and Tempered |
1⁄4" - 21⁄2" 25⁄8" - 4" |
105 95 |
125 115 |
NA |
ASTM A354 Grade BC | Yes | 1⁄4" - 21⁄2" 25⁄8" - 4" |
109 99 |
125 115 |
C26 C22 |
|
ASTM F1554 Grade 105 | Yes | 1⁄2" - 3" | 105 | 125 | NA | |
ASTM A320 Grade L7 | Yes | 1⁄4" - 21⁄2" | 105 | 125 | NA | |
ASTM F3125/A490 | No | 1⁄2" - 11⁄2" | 130 | 150 | C33 | |
ASTM A354 Grade BD | No | 1⁄2" - 4" | 130 | 150 | C33 | |
SAE J429 Grade 8 | No | 1⁄4" - 11⁄2" | 130 | 150 | C33 |
Effect of Heat on Quenched and Tempered Fasteners
The second issue of concern when considering hot-dip galvanizing high strength fasteners is potentially reducing the mechanical strengths due to the introduction of heat during the hot-dip galvanizing process. Portland Bolt operates its hot-dip galvanizing tank at 840° Fahrenheit. Is this enough heat to potentially alter the strength of a quenched and tempered fastener? In theory, the amount of heat that a high strength fastener is exposed to during the hot-dip galvanizing process should not alter its mechanical properties.
It is obvious that the application of heat to a bolt that develops its strength through a heat treating process could adversely affect the strength of the fastener. The question is, how much heat is necessary to potentially change the mechanical properties? On page 4-4 of the Ninth Edition of the AISC Manual (American Institute of Steel Construction), the following statement occurs:
“Anchor bolt material that is quenched and tempered (heat treated) should not be welded or heated.”
However, it does not address the amount of heat that should be avoided. Welding obviously applies a tremendous amount of heat to the components being welded, whereas hot-dip galvanizing is performed at significantly lower temperatures. Another reference that addresses the heating of high strength bolts (which occurs during hot-dip galvanizing) can be found in the ASTM F1554 specification. Section 6.5.3 of the ASTM F1554 specification states:
“The maximum hot bending temperature for heat treated anchor bolts shall be less than….1000F for grade 105. Anchor bolts shall be allowed to air cool after bending.”
Although this statement refers to hot bending, it implies that any process (including galvanizing) that applies heat approaching or exceeding the tempering temperature of a high strength bolt may potentially alter the mechanical properties of the fastener and should therefore be avoided. However, galvanized bolts only remain in the zinc tank for a few minutes and even though the surface temperature may approach 840°, it is unlikely that the entire fastener is heated to that temperature. The most relevant reference found in any ASTM specification addressing the possibility of the hot-dip galvanizing process altering the mechanical properties of a high strength fastener is found in section 7.2.1.2 of the new hot-dip galvanizing specification ASTM F2329 which states:
“Testing for mechanical properties is not necessary if the galvanizing process is carried out at a lower temperature than the stress relief or tempering temperature of the fasteners.”
This implies that the mechanical properties have the potential to be altered only if high strength bolts are tempered at temperatures at or below the 840° temperature that the bolts are subjected to during hot-dip galvanizing. As Table 2 indicates below, the minimum tempering temperature for both ASTM A193 grade B7 and ASTM F1554 grade 105 is 1100° Fahrenheit. Therefore, it is not possible for the galvanizing temperatures to exceed the tempering temperature for these specifications. Although in theory it is possible for the other specifications to be tempered below the galvanizing temperature, recent records indicate that the minimum tempering temperature used for any of these grades listed in Table 2 that Portland Bolt has manufactured is 950°. Therefore, hot-dip galvanizing performed by Portland Bolt on any of the high strength bolt specifications listed in Table 2 will not adversely affect the strength of these fasteners.
Minimum Tempering Temperatures
ASTM Grade | Minimum Tempering Temperature, Fahrenheit |
---|---|
A325 | 800° |
A449 | 800° |
A354 Grade BC | 800° |
A320 Grade L7 | No Requirement |
A193 Grade B7 | 1100° |
F1554 Grade 105 | 1100° |
Nowdays,it is seen that Geomat coating are used on Gr 10.9 HSFG Bolt. What type of coating were done on Gr 10.9 HSFG Bolt in International major bridges made before 2005?
@R.K.- Sorry, but we are not familiar with what coating was used on international bridge jobs prior to 2005. We manufacture and supply bolts made per ASTM standards, so we are less familiar with the international standards.
Hello,
Could we use washer of 10.9 grade with ASTM A325 bolt? or there is compatibility issue and only washer of 8.8 grade with ASTM A325 bolt could be used?
Thanks
@Hisham- The washer required with A325 bolts is an ASTM F436 washer. A 10.9 or 8.8 washer may work for the application, but you would need to get the substitution approved by the project engineer.
Hi,
Can you please explain me that the SAE J429 Grade 8 bolt is the same of SAE 5140 grade 8.8?
Is there any possibility to use SAE 5140 Grade 8.8 as anchor rod in the place of Bs 3692?
I aware portland bolt is not manufacturing thi SAE 5140 GRade 8.8. However, please give me the guidance.
@Bhoopathi- I am sorry, but we are not familiar with SAE 5140 nor BS 3692, so we cannot speak to the requirements of those grades. Apologies.
Can Class 8.8, 10.9 and 12.9 steel bolts be hot dip galvanized?
@Kris- Class 8.8 bolts are ok to galvanize, but the 10.9 and 12.9 will be high enough in strength that they will run the risk of hydrogen embrittlement. We’d recommend against galvanizing them.
Hi sir ,
Based on which standard we can say that 10.9 is not possible to hot dip galvanized
@Mohamed- I do not have any published information to say that 10.9 cannot be galvanized, however, ASTM grades of similar strength (A490, A354 BD) either prohibit, or caution against hot dip galvanizing. We have chosen to use that same caution for 10.9 fasteners.
urgent answer pleas :
I do not know whether the documents in accordance with the standard screws made of weathering steel ( a325 type 3 ) can be hot-dip galvanizing. with regard to the impact of high temperatures in hot-dip galvanizing process whereby the Embrittlement .
tanks
@Behrouz- Normally speaking A325 type 1 or type 3 bolts can be galvanized without rick of hydrogen embrittlement. However, there is no benefit to galvanizing type 3 materials, since they are inherently corrosion resistant. If galvanized fasteners are required, type 1 will be commonly available and much less expensive than trying to galvanize type 3 bolts.